I came across an interesting theory. People act according to their conviction about the nature of God. If God is perceived as an autocratic patriarch whose rules must be followed without question, then that is how the leaders of that group will act. If God is viewed as a stern judge who is inflexible concerning any hint of rebellion or disobedience, that is how fathers will deal with their sons and daughters. If God is seen as a demanding taskmaster who demands perfection, then mothers will be strict with their children. If God is understood to be a harsh God of wrath, this justifies a severe response towards those who have broken the law (I recall a protestor’s sign in a Time magazine photo: “God hates gays”).
People act according to their conviction about the nature of God
This theory would seem to be a logical conclusion to being created in God’s image (Gen 1:26,27). This would be true not only for Christian who are called to be perfect as God is perfect (Mt 5:48), but to other religions as well. The 9-11 attackers lived out their understanding of the nature of God. We all try to respond to our situation according to the way we think God would act. The question is, what does this reveal about the nature of the God we worship?
Our Christian view of God must begin and end with Christ
If the theory is true, then it is of first importance to cultivate a correct belief about the nature of God. But where do we start when the Bible does present God as the absolute authority, the stern judge, the demanding taskmaster and a God of wrath? I suggest that all these descriptions must be interpreted through the perspective of God as seen in Christ. Our Christian view of God must begin and end with Christ and all other revelation must be viewed through the New Testament perspective of God as he has been revealed as a human being.
Following this assumption, any view of God that undermines the love and justice of the heavenly Father – a love so great that it “surpasses knowledge” (Eph 3;19) – should be dismissed as a misunderstanding or a perversion of the truth. If God, seen in Jesus, is good, loving and just above all that we can imagine, then any conception of God cannot be correct which views him in a fashion that would make him less loving, merciful, just or good than our perception of the ideal. Any view of God as loving that makes him appear less just, or any view of God as just that makes him appear less loving, needs to be rejected as false. Our foundational view of God is Christ who gave us the image of the loving Father who makes things right (e.g., the prodigal son in Luke 15). We must begin there and put aside any thought that takes us off track from that core belief. If we can imagine a better, more loving or more merciful God than the god we worship, then it is time to reject the God we have created in our minds, for that is not the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ.
When my children speak about the God of their father, I hope they [speak about] a caring, merciful and just heavenly Father
I find this meditation helpful because I need to look carefully at myself and think about what my actions are saying about the God I worship. When I act harshly and justify it in my mind, that justification stems from what I imagine God to be like. But if that image of God does not fit with the merciful, self-giving God who suffered on the cross so that we can live, then that is idolatry. When my children speak about the God of their father, I hope they do not speak about an autocratic patriarch, a stern judge or a demanding taskmaster, but a caring, merciful and just heavenly Father.